@article {83168,
	title = {Climate change and Oregon law: What is to be done?},
	journal = {Journal of Environmental Law \& Litigation},
	volume = {33},
	number = {[12]  },
	year = {2018},
	note = {The legal system often seems to change more slowly than the social and environmental milieu in which it functions.  It is encouraging to find good minds looking at the problems caused by climate change and their repercussions on the legal system.  In this article, the authors offer some practical advice Oregonians can use to adjust their laws to climate change.  {\textquotedblleft}We examine two aspects of that response. The first concerns planning and regulation of land, and the second concerns the effects of climate change on property law. We suggest that traditional property law doctrines, such as reliction, avulsion, property boundaries, and public easements should be reexamined in the light of this crisis{\textquotedblright} (p.239). If we are to adapt to climate change, our institutions must adapt, and forward-looking publications like this will help.},
	month = {2018},
	pages = {p.235-323},
	keywords = {climate, environmental law and policy, land use, water use},
	url = {https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/23295},
	author = {Brickley, Alan K. and Schell, Steven R. and Sullivan, Edward J.}
}
@article {52416,
	title = {Adapting to climate change on the Oregon coast:  lines in the sand and rolling easements},
	journal = {Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2013},
	note = {In this important article, the authors argue that Oregon should be working to strengthen its laws now in order to have the flexibility and legal framework to enable it to adapt to a changing climate and sea level rise.  {\textquotedblleft}Processes are needed to decide what infrastructure will be replaced and what will not before these inevitable events occur. . . .  Planning can ensure that shoreline armoring does not eliminate public access along the shore or total loss of sand on Oregon{\textquoteright}s beaches. Planning tools can make clear that the public access boundary does migrate inland, even if the shoreline migrates onto an inland parcel across which the public does not currently have access.{\textquotedblright} (p.514)},
	pages = {p.447-514},
	keywords = {Alsea Bay, Alsea Spit, beaches, Cape Lookout State Park, climate change, coastal hazards, environmental law and policy, environmental policy and law, erosion, flooding, Netarts Bay, New River, physical modifications, riprap, sand spits, shorelines, The Capes, Tillamook Bay, tsunamis, wave heights},
	url = {https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/17378},
	author = {Johnson, Courtney B. and Schell, Steven R.}
}
